Israel and Saudi Arabia are the culprits.
NY Times 1989: no global warming trend
by Jon Rappoport
December 29, 2016
The New York Times, the “paper of record,” published a very interesting piece on January 26, 1989. The headline read: “US Data since 1895 Fail to Show Warming Trend.”
Here are a few key paragraphs:
“After examining climate data extending back nearly 100 years, a team of Government scientists has concluded that there has been no significant change in average temperatures or rainfall in the United States over that entire period.”
“While the nation’s weather in individual years or even for periods of years has been hotter or cooler and drier or wetter than in other periods, the new study shows that over the last century there has been no trend in one direction or another.”
“The study, made by scientists for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was published in the current issue of Geophysical Research…
View original post 493 more words
Trump and Goldman Sacks – orrather, Goldman Sacks, the criminal organisation an d their puppet Trump who will betray the American workers he has conned, like the cheap American conman that he is. He must be cold and cruel to have talked to thousands of frightened people, pretending that he cares for them.
This has to be confronted.
USEFUL for freedom on the Internet.
Putin warning us all that “they” are promoting pedophilia in the West – and it will destroy us.
Technocracy: evolution told as a fairy tale
by Jon Rappoport
December 25, 2016
“Technocratic human beings are spiritually dead. They are capable of anything, no matter how heinous, because they do not reflect upon or question the ultimate goal.” —Chris Hedges
“River and ocean turbines for electricity; hydrogen power; urban farms; massive water desalination—these are just a few of the means for making an abundant non-technocratic future. By any rational standard, technocratic idiocy is already obsolete.” —The Underground, Jon Rappoport
—Again, thanks to Patrick Wood and his book, Technocracy Rising, for expanding my insight into these areas.
Consider the term “scientific humanism.” The Oxford Dictionary offers this definition: “A form of humanist theory and practice that is based on the principles and methods of science; specifically the doctrine that human beings should employ scientific methods in studying human life and behaviour, in order to direct the welfare and future…
View original post 921 more words
According to the Obama person too.
Chemtrails – Experimenting on the Public.